20 May 2008

The Real Cost Of Credit

The following is a guest post from reader BP

The Real Cost Of Credit

The real cost of credit needs to take into account earnings notably the after tax or disposable income. Interest rates are one thing - the level of indebtness is another! Current levels of debt to disposable income are about 80% - it used to be about 52% until about 3 years ago when it suddenly took off. Such easy credit fueled the property run. Property was never "cheap" in the first place - easy credit pushed it to dizzying heights. At the same time from mid-2003, we had an equity bull market. By all means the residential property market outpaced it - in cape town it did. Where would that be a normal occurence? It is an incredible exception - not to be repeated for a very long time.

As interest rates respond to inflation that is grinding down peoples spending power and hurting the poor, people are crying about high interest rates. Did they never conceive that interest rates could increase from multi-decade lows? Or was it different this time - as told by the knowledgeable estate agents! And inflation will rise further as will prime. bets are on for a definite 50 points next month and a 60% chance of another 50 points in August! Prime at 16%. Not too high?

Consider the following 2 useful indicators:

1) The cost of debt-servicing as a percentage of Income. Current debt to disposable income is 80% and interest rates are 15% (15.55 next month). that means that the real cost of servicing is the product of these 2 or 12% (12.4% next month). Not too high? Consider the crisis of 1998 - debt to disposable income was 52% and prime hit 25.5% making the cost of servicing 13.26%. sure it only stayed there for a short time but it did d damage. We are currently not too far off that now. Prime at 16.5% equates to this punitive figure (16.5% * 80% approximates 25.5% *52%). BUT even so it is not only the level that counts but how high it stays up there! In effect, looking at a graph, it is not the curve that is important but the area under it (the integration of the curve for the mathematically minded). And with inflation set to rise further bet on it staying up there longer.

2) The penalty for borrowing money is actually the real cost of a loan, simply the difference between inflation and the prime rate. Currently it is 4.4% (15% - 10.6%) which by historical standards is really low - the average over the last 15 years is about 7%. so another 1.5% - 2% increase in prime is not impossible to equate to the average.

These two indicators indicate one thing: interest rates will increase in the near term and will rise further before they can be considered as "punitive".

A last comment on inflation. With commodity prices staying high (as per the CRB index of overall commodities), inflation has to feed through. It has already started in food and fuel. Wait for cars, clothing, furniture, and so on. and even though the economy stagnates, if inflation is rising the Reserve Bank HAS to raise rates. In the past, this is what Central banks have done. Such "stagflation" (economic stagnation and inflation rising) portent very hard times. Remember the "sour 70's" where a series of crises and market reversals ruined fixed asset values. They can easily arise again. My view is that they are which is why all my money is in cash products.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi CT Bubble

Keep up the good work. Thank you BP, it is well written. I have also changed my portfolio to invest more in money. Yes, that's the money I have saved from renting instead of buying *Thank's CT Bubble / CJ :-)*. Even now I can purchase a house for R 900 000 which a few months ago went for R 120 000 000. Some still say there were no bubble....

CT Bubble said...

Thanks for the comment citizen. That drop from R1.2 million to R900 000 is quite large!

Anonymous said...

Very interesting read. Regarding house prices dropping, I have been tracking a house in the Southern Suburbs of Cape Town originally listed at R4.5M, then dropped to R3.8M and now the agent is saying that the seller is very desperate due to having bought a second house and struggling to service two bonds ie possibly available at R2.5M?. Interesting times ahead. PS where does BP source this data as I would like to do further research.

Anonymous said...

Nice graphs - I am seeing a lot of similarities between 1985 and now - the only real difference is that bond rates were several points higher back then.

The inflation graph, the HP graph and the ‘real HP’ graph have pretty much the same numbers now as they did back in early 1985. In both periods, 3.5 years previously, there had also been a 40% y on y nominal house peak.

There are 2 differences between 1985 and now. Back then, although the top boom year’s nominal peak had been 40%, the real peak was only 27% whereas this time, although the nominal was also 40%, the real peak went up to 37% – in other words, compared to inflation the HP increase was actually higher this time than then. Which means it should now fall even further than then.

The other difference is that back then, by this stage in the cycle, the bank bond rate had already climbed to 23% from 17% and it then went up to 25% before dropping. We are presently still at 15% but with much upside potential.

Back then prices went on to drop -13.5% nominally and -54% real. From early 85 it would take 3.5 years before house prices returned to the same nominal level and 21 years before they returned to the same real level.

I have previously calculated that our real price drop needs to be -64% not -54% so obviously the nominal drop will also be more than last time. In fact nominally, we may have already reached the -13.5% drop we saw last time, but the real drop still has -40% to go.

A possible 5 year scenario that fits would be
CPI Inflation going 12%, 14%, 13%, 10%,11%
And house price Y on Y going
-15%,-10%,-5%,-1%,1%
That would give us 64% down real and 28% down nominal.

A higher initial fall,
ie -20%,-10%,-5%,-1%,6%
would give us a nominal drop of -32% and the same -64% real drop.

If we assume that inflation then stayed at 10% a year for the following 4 years (after this initial 5 year scenario) and house prices rose 10% a year for the same period, then in 9 years time house prices in nominal terms will return to what they were last December. However it would take more than 20 years for the real price to return to last December levels.

Anonymous said...

To anonymous

The data came from the StatsSA and the reserve bank website. If anonymous leaves an email I will send the spreadsheet to him/her.

I'll also update it periodically - say monthly.


-BP